Romney/Ryan* - "Social Darwinism"
Make no mistake, I am not associating President Obama with Proxymoron for using "Social Darwinism" wrong. I am not using Social Darwinism as it is commonly** used, since it evolves.
** "common sense is not so common"
Related proxy-aphorism? Counter-Rush or Tea Party or FOX Think.
*** If corporations have become persons, what is society?
Further sources of comment on this event.
The White House (the event: AP Luncheon)
[I Ron Knee of the Bottom Line? That I have yet to listen to the full speech.]
(Footnote: last link entered simul-speech about 14:40 on. Mitt Maligns Marvelous!)
[Loopholes? The Mitt Medvedev Moment. By George. Apologies for the tongue in cheek or cubism on the side but please Ctrl F "Loopholes"under the bold MMM.]
[Other Message Mean 'm, or Forum or 40m mark in video? Check that, 38 minutes, first question, not to mention BS remark. Grand Slam ? Or B in GO!]
[Speaking of GPS: "What we have here" is a Galley Project SimpBowlized, by the deficit commission and the Kitchen/Boat math, marvelous mangling and tale gating. (Also see 2 comments.)]
[P.S. under a Google of "AP Luncheon" I found this interesting Hoist by his own Picard by John Hull. A careful reading and reference to sources would indicate a hoist of his own profession not to mention his metaphorical name. My father had a boat made by Swiftsure. Three flushes you're out! The three strikes are A. the fact-check error. B. the Lockner v. New York error C. the Wickard v. Filburn error. In context: Obama is a "professor", Lockner v. New York was probably what Obama was referring to or in era in general, which John Hull flushes, and Wickard v. Filburn recognized the power of the federal government to regulate economic activity. I mean, the gizzard of that guy.]
8-16-12
P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)
8-16-12
P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)
4 comments:
The Mitt Medvedev Moment is a link to the video with transcript clicked on. Ctrl F(for find) "loopholes" to find the "marvelous" "flexibility" of Mitt Romney and the Raw Money Class. Or is it the Righteous Mind Clueless?
I also "mean" to hint that the first question President Obama answers was a "heckuva pitch". And that is a heckuva dynamic metaphor for our future. i.e. pitch as in the question, the answer and the slope, not to mention our field of dreams and game theories. And a tip of the rally cap to Jonathan Haidt and Robert Wright under the context of asterisk three.
BTW: As if I have run out of segues, I will not that I believe that it was three for three on the Q&A portion of the AP Luncheon.
And my last text @"Speaking of GPS" was the trigger to the rest of the GPS under APL(AP Luncheon), for Advanced Political Leaning in the Galley reference to mixed food and travel metaphors. Not to mention holding court.
Speaking of Grand Slams or Four Post Comments(Embedding) I will note that my last swing was at the Keith Olbermann situation, where the last two links I have added are at "guy" and "NOT"(@i.e.) and are a reference to the "Related proxy-aphorism?" and the issue of counter balancing the likes of some people. Not to pun on math or Countdown.
Post a Comment